Straightforward comparisons against every tool you're considering. What each does well, where Surfe closes the gap, and how to test it on your own list.
Choosing the right prospecting platform shouldn't mean compromising on data quality, workflow efficiency, or CRM accuracy. Whether you're comparing Surfe to FullEnrich, ZoomInfo, Lusha, or other providers, you'll see how Surfe combines verified contact data from multiple providers, seamless prospecting, and CRM synchronization in one platform - helping GTM teams spend less time on admin and more time selling.
Sales Navigator finds the person. Surfe finds their verified email and mobile: 89.4% and 94.9% found in Surfe’s own 4,945-profile benchmark.
FullEnrich enriches your spreadsheets. In a head-to-head test on 1,000 harder-to-find profiles, Surfe found more of them too: 65.7% of mobiles against FullEnrich’s 57.9%.
LeadIQ captures a contact fast and charges ten credits to guess at a phone number. Surfe found 94.9% of mobiles in its own benchmark and charges only when the number turns out to be real.
Kaspr reveals a European phone number and hopes it’s a mobile. Surfe found 94.9% of mobiles in its own benchmark, with every number checked for line type before a rep dials.
Clay is a spreadsheet-style workspace for building enrichment workflows. Surfe is what your sales team opens instead: a live waterfall that found 89.4% of emails and 94.9% of mobiles, with nothing to configure.
Cognism built its name on EMEA data. Surfe found 90.6% of EMEA emails in the same benchmark, against Cognism’s 67.7%.
Lusha built a database of cheap reveals. Surfe built one that’s actually validated: 89.4% of emails found, against Lusha’s 71.6%.
ZoomInfo has the name everyone knows. Surfe has the data breadth and reliability everyone needs.
Apollos 56% mobile find rate vs Surfes 94%. Which one is your pipeline built on?
%201%20(1)%20(1).avif)
