FullEnrich is the closest thing to Surfe’s own architecture sold on its own. A waterfall across more than twenty providers, billing that only charges for verified results, and a CSV and API-first design built for ops teams who want a straightforward enrichment engine without extra scaffolding around it.
What it doesn’t have is a place for a rep to actually use it. There’s no browser extension and no workflow on the platforms where prospecting happens, the CRM integration covers HubSpot and Salesforce today with Pipedrive still listed as coming, and there’s no search, signals, or lookalikes for finding new contacts. It enriches the lists a team already brought it.
Surfe starts from the same premise, a validated waterfall beats any single database, and builds the rest of the system around it: a front end reps actually open, CRM sync that runs in both directions on all four major CRMs, duplicate prevention before a record ever gets created, and ongoing monitoring for job changes after the contact lands.
FullEnrich
Six situations where a front end changes what an enrichment engine can actually do, and where FullEnrich’s CSV-first design shows its limits.
An enrichment engine without somewhere for a rep to use it is still a CSV with better numbers.
FullEnrich lists Pipedrive as coming soon. Surfe’s integrations are live and bidirectional today.
FullEnrich enriches the lists a team already has. Surfe helps find the next ones too.
A CSV import can’t know what already exists in a CRM. Every overlap becomes a duplicate someone has to clean up.
An enriched file starts aging the moment it downloads. Surfe keeps watching afterward.
FullEnrich’s core use case doesn’t disappear with Surfe. The CSV and API enrichment run the same waterfall and validation as the extension.
FullEnrich isn’t the only enrichment engine worth a second look. See how Surfe stacks up elsewhere.
Sales Navigator finds the person. Surfe finds their verified email and mobile: 89.4% and 94.9% found in Surfe’s own 4,945-profile benchmark.
LeadIQ captures a contact fast and charges ten credits to guess at a phone number. Surfe found 94.9% of mobiles in its own benchmark and charges only when the number turns out to be real.
Kaspr reveals a European phone number and hopes it’s a mobile. Surfe found 94.9% of mobiles in its own benchmark, with every number checked for line type before a rep dials.
Clay is a spreadsheet-style workspace for building enrichment workflows. Surfe is what your sales team opens instead: a live waterfall that found 89.4% of emails and 94.9% of mobiles, with nothing to configure.
Cognism built its name on EMEA data. Surfe found 90.6% of EMEA emails in the same benchmark, against Cognism’s 67.7%.
Lusha built a database of cheap reveals. Surfe built one that’s actually validated: 89.4% of emails found, against Lusha’s 71.6%.
ZoomInfo built the biggest database. Surfe built one that actually finds people: 89.4% of emails found, against ZoomInfo’s 52.3%.
Apollo built a broad database. Surfe built one that actually finds people: 94.9% of mobile numbers found, against Apollo’s 56.3%.
%201%20(1)%20(1).avif)
.avif)
